People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jackson

36 A.D.2d 1008, 321 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4107

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 A.D.2d 1006 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 1971·Published

Opinion

Memorandum: Since no appeal was taken by the District Attorney from the order granting defendant’s application to be resentenced, we are not empowered to review the propriety of that order and, as a consequence, we are now constrained to grant defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction. The death of the court reporter and absence of any stenographic notes of the trial foreclose the defendant from having an appellate review of any of the evidence and rulings of the trial court. (People v. Schwach, 16 A D 2d 879; People v. Lomoso, 284 App. Div. 670.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: Since no appeal was taken by the District Attorney from the order granting defendant’s application to be resentenced, we are not empowered to review the propriety of that order and, as a consequence, we are now constrained to grant defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction. The death of the court reporter and absence of any stenographic notes of the trial foreclose the defendant from having an appellate review of any of the evidence and rulings of the trial court. (People v. Schwach, 16 A D 2d 879; People v. Lomoso, 284 App. Div. 670.)

People v. Jackson, 36 A.D.2d 1008, 321 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4107 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

36 A.D.2d 1008 (People v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related