People v. Jackson
This text of 36 A.D.2d 1008 (People v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum: Since no appeal was taken by the District Attorney from the order granting defendant’s application to be resentenced, we are not empowered to review the propriety of that order and, as a consequence, we are now constrained to grant defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction. The death of the court reporter and absence of any stenographic notes of the trial foreclose the defendant from having an appellate review of any of the evidence and rulings of the trial court. (People v. Schwach, 16 A D 2d 879; People v. Lomoso, 284 App. Div. 670.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 A.D.2d 1008, 321 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jackson-nyappdiv-1971.