People v. Jackson

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Jackson

314 N.E.2d 875, 34 N.Y.2d 756, 358 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1555

DecidedJune 5, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 314 N.E.2d 875 (People v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jackson, 314 N.E.2d 875, 34 N.Y.2d 756, 358 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1555 (N.Y. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: It may be said that certain aspects of the conduct of the defense in this case, viewed in retrospect, were probably unwise. Only questions of trial tactics were involved, however, and we conclude that defendant was not denied effective representation. We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Rabin. Taking no part: Judge Stevens.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: It may be said that certain aspects of the conduct of the defense in this case, viewed in retrospect, were probably unwise. Only questions of trial tactics were involved, however, and we conclude that defendant was not denied effective representation. We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Rabin. Taking no part: Judge Stevens.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 N.E.2d 875, 34 N.Y.2d 756, 358 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jackson-ny-1974.