People v. Jackson
This text of 205 N.E.2d 877 (People v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended, upon consent of counsel for both parties and in conformity with one of the alternatives permitted by the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States in Jackson v. Denno (378 U. S. 368), so as to vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and to remand the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new trial. [See 10 N Y 2d 780.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 N.E.2d 877, 15 N.Y.2d 851, 257 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jackson-ny-1965.