People v. Jackson CA2/6

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 18, 2016
DocketB267573
StatusUnpublished

This text of People v. Jackson CA2/6 (People v. Jackson CA2/6) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jackson CA2/6, (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Filed 4/18/16 P. v. Jackson CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B267573 (Super. Ct. Nos. 2013027585, 2014037070, Plaintiff and Respondent, 2015010490, 2015019806) (Ventura County) v.

TAYLOR JACKSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Taylor Jackson appeals the judgment entered after he pled guilty to second- degree burglary (Pen. Code,1 §§ 459, 460, subd. (b)), carrying a concealed dirk or dagger (§ 21310), and possessing ammunition (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1)). Appellant also admitted allegations that he had served a prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) and committed the latter two offenses while out on bail on the burglary charge (§ 12022.1, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced him to four years in state prison, consisting of the midterm of two years for the section 30305 charge (the principal term) plus a two-year enhancement under subdivision (b) of section 12022.1. Concurrent two-year terms were imposed on the other two offenses, and the prior prison term enhancements and remaining out-on-bail enhancements were stricken in the interests of justice.

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated. Because appellant pled guilty prior to a preliminary hearing, the relevant facts are derived from the probation report. In August 2014, appellant committed a burglary at a restaurant in Ojai that was closed for the night. He stole an iPad and speaker from the premises. He was identified as the perpetrator after deputies reviewed the restaurant's surveillance cameras. In April 2015, appellant was detained in an apartment complex's parking lot after a security guard reported that appellant appeared to be casing the lot to conduct vehicle burglaries. The police searched appellant and found a knife in his pocket. The following June, appellant was detained after he was observed casing vehicles in a department store parking lot. The police searched his backpack and found bullets and a firearm magazine. We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. On February 22, 2016, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. He did not respond. We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.) The judgment is affirmed. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

PERREN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

TANGEMAN, J.

2 David M. Hirsh, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Wende
600 P.2d 1071 (California Supreme Court, 1979)
People v. Kelly
146 P.3d 547 (California Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Jackson CA2/6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jackson-ca26-calctapp-2016.