People v. Jabbar

99 A.D.3d 448, 951 N.Y.2d 395

This text of 99 A.D.3d 448 (People v. Jabbar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jabbar, 99 A.D.3d 448, 951 N.Y.2d 395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

We reject defendant’s challenges to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting the robbery conviction (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence amply supported the conclusion that, after unsuccessfully attempting to take the victim’s money by way of a confidence game, defendant took the money by force (see e.g. People v Spencer, 255 AD2d 167 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 879 [1999]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Andrias, J.E, Sweeny, Catterson, Moskowitz and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 448, 951 N.Y.2d 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jabbar-nyappdiv-2012.