People v. Ivy

194 N.W.2d 735, 37 Mich. App. 438
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 9, 1971
DocketDocket No. 10996
StatusPublished

This text of 194 N.W.2d 735 (People v. Ivy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ivy, 194 N.W.2d 735, 37 Mich. App. 438 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

J. H. Gillis, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon in a vehicle, and appeals. The people have filed a motion to affirm.

Upon examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm granted.

Judge Targonski would deny the motion to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 N.W.2d 735, 37 Mich. App. 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ivy-michctapp-1971.