People v. Issac
94 A.D.3d 1142, 942 N.Y.S.2d 810
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Issac. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 A.D.3d 1055 →
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Camacho, J.), imposed May 2, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J., Florio, Balkin and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Issac, 94 A.D.3d 1142, 942 N.Y.S.2d 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
94 A.D.3d 1142 (People v. Issac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)