People v. Isidore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Isidore

201 A.D.2d 932, 607 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Isidore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Isidore, 201 A.D.2d 932, 607 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record does not reveal that the defense of justification was raised upon the trial of the indictment charging defendant with second degree assault (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). Neither the victim nor defendant testified at trial. In People v Steele (26 NY2d 526, 528), the Court of Appeals stated: "Of course, justification, as an affirmative element, need not be disproved in every case. Ordinarily, the possibility of the defense would not appear until injected by the defendant”. In any event, had defendant sufficiently raised that defense, we would conclude that the People disproved it beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v McManus, 67 NY2d 541, 546-547; People v Sykes, 178 AD2d 501, lv denied 79 NY2d 953; People v Sweeney, 122 AD2d 177, 178, lv denied 69 NY2d 886). The People’s witness, a police officer, testified that, while on routine vehicular patrol, he saw defendant repeatedly strike the unarmed victim about the head and upper body with a metal pipe. The victim and his clothes were covered with blood and he was bleeding from the [933]*933head. Whether defendant was the aggressor presented an issue of credibility, which the trial court, acting as the fact finder, resolved against defendant (see, People v Sweeney, supra, at 178). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Attempted Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record does not reveal that the defense of justification was raised upon the trial of the indictment charging defendant with second degree assault (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). Neither the victim nor defendant testified at trial. In People v Steele (26 NY2d 526, 528), the Court of Appeals stated: "Of course, justification, as an affirmative element, need not be disproved in every case. Ordinarily, the possibility of the defense would not appear until injected by the defendant”. In any event, had defendant sufficiently raised that defense, we would conclude that the People disproved it beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v McManus, 67 NY2d 541, 546-547; People v Sykes, 178 AD2d 501, lv denied 79 NY2d 953; People v Sweeney, 122 AD2d 177, 178, lv denied 69 NY2d 886). The People’s witness, a police officer, testified that, while on routine vehicular patrol, he saw defendant repeatedly strike the unarmed victim about the head and upper body with a metal pipe. The victim and his clothes were covered with blood and he was bleeding from the [933]*933head. Whether defendant was the aggressor presented an issue of credibility, which the trial court, acting as the fact finder, resolved against defendant (see, People v Sweeney, supra, at 178). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Attempted Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 932, 607 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-isidore-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack