People v. Ishi Moise

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ishi Moise

298 A.D.2d 467, 748 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 298 A.D.2d 467 (People v. Ishi Moise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ishi Moise, 298 A.D.2d 467, 748 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Knipel, J.), rendered December 11, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to sever his trial from the codefendant’s. The defendant failed [468]*468to demonstrate that the core of each defense was in irreconcilable conflict with the other. The defendant claimed that he acted in self defense in drawing a knife on the victim in connection with the assault and weapons charges against him, and the codefendant asserted, in defense of the murder charges against him, that a third party shot the victim (see People v Mahboubian, 74 NY2d 174, 183-184; People v Johnson, 296 AD2d 422). Moreover, the defendant was not prejudiced by the joint trial (see People v Echevarria, 282 AD2d 470). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Schmidt and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Knipel, J.), rendered December 11, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to sever his trial from the codefendant’s. The defendant failed [468]*468to demonstrate that the core of each defense was in irreconcilable conflict with the other. The defendant claimed that he acted in self defense in drawing a knife on the victim in connection with the assault and weapons charges against him, and the codefendant asserted, in defense of the murder charges against him, that a third party shot the victim (see People v Mahboubian, 74 NY2d 174, 183-184; People v Johnson, 296 AD2d 422). Moreover, the defendant was not prejudiced by the joint trial (see People v Echevarria, 282 AD2d 470). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Schmidt and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 467, 748 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ishi-moise-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack