People v. Isaac

40 A.D.3d 1118, 834 N.Y.S.2d 883
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 2007·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), rendered January 19, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The prosecution established a sufficient chain of custody of the controlled substance recovered from the defendant upon his arrest, and the prosecution witnesses provided reasonable assurances of the composition of the controlled substance and of its unchanged condition between its recovery and the trial (see People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340, 343 [1977]; People v Pearson, 270 AD2d 290 [2000]; People v Flores-Ossa, 234 AD2d 315 [1996]; People v Leach, 203 AD2d 483 [1994]). Any deficiencies in the chain of custody went only to the weight to be accorded the evidence, not its admissibility (see People v Julian, supra; People v Gibson, 28 AD3d 576, 576 [2006]; People v Bryant, 302 AD2d 603, 604 [2003]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Mastro, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Carni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Isaac, 40 A.D.3d 1118, 834 N.Y.S.2d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

40 A.D.3d 1118 (People v. Isaac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bain
85 A.D.3d 1193 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Javen C.
57 A.D.3d 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Alomar
55 A.D.3d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Morgan
48 A.D.3d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)