People v. Isaac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Isaac

279 A.D.2d 479, 718 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 479 (People v. Isaac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Isaac, 279 A.D.2d 479, 718 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), rendered November 24, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant voluntarily, knowingly, ánd intelligently waived his right to appeal all aspects of this case. His waiver encompassed his right to appellate review of the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, as well as his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Lewis, 275 AD2d 800; People v Monk, 270 AD2d 433; People v Johnson, 269 AD2d 468; People v Perez, 267 AD2d 335; People v Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89). Accordingly, appellate review of these issues is precluded. Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), rendered November 24, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant voluntarily, knowingly, ánd intelligently waived his right to appeal all aspects of this case. His waiver encompassed his right to appellate review of the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, as well as his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Lewis, 275 AD2d 800; People v Monk, 270 AD2d 433; People v Johnson, 269 AD2d 468; People v Perez, 267 AD2d 335; People v Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89). Accordingly, appellate review of these issues is precluded. Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 479, 718 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-isaac-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack