People v. Irwin

166 A.D.2d 924, 561 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12252
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1990·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

On reargument, judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: On February 2, 1990, we affirmed the judgment entered upon a plea of guilty convicting defendant of two counts of attempted sodomy in the first degree and two counts of sodomy in the second degree. Subsequently, we granted defendant’s pro se motion for reargument. On reargument, defendant contends that he was improperly convicted of two counts of attempted sodomy in the first degree.

Our review of the transcript of the plea minutes shows that, although the District Attorney and defendant entered into a plea agreement whereby defendant would plead guilty to two counts of attempted sodomy in the first degree and two counts of sodomy in the second degree in satisfaction of a 74-count [925] indictment, the court asked defendant how he pleaded to two counts of attempted sodomy in the second degree as well as two counts of sodomy in the second degree. The certificate of conviction recites that defendant was convicted of two counts of attempted sodomy in the first degree and two counts of sodomy in the second degree, and defendant was sentenced accordingly.

Because defendant did not plead to attempted sodomy in the first degree, we modify the judgment of conviction by reducing the two convictions for attempted sodomy in the first degree to attempted sodomy in the second degree and by vacating the sentences imposed thereon, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing on those counts.

Because the District Attorney did not consent to the acceptance of a plea to attempted sodomy in the second degree, the court should entertain a motion by the People, should the People be so disposed, to vacate the plea and set aside the conviction in its entirety (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 307-308). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J.—attempted sodomy, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Irwin, 166 A.D.2d 924, 561 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

166 A.D.2d 924 (People v. Irwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Burns
2025 NY Slip Op 02488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Harris
2020 NY Slip Op 2394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Jones
2017 NY Slip Op 7072 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
HARRIS, JOSEPH A., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Ignatowski
70 A.D.3d 1472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Hinckley
50 A.D.3d 1466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Speed
13 A.D.3d 1083 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Fazar
288 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Allen
267 A.D.2d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Keiffer
207 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)