People v. Irvin

2019 NY Slip Op 143
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 9, 2019
DocketInd. No. 1612/13
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 143 (People v. Irvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Irvin, 2019 NY Slip Op 143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Irvin (2019 NY Slip Op 00143)
People v Irvin
2019 NY Slip Op 00143
Decided on January 9, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 9, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2015-12097
(Ind. No. 1612/13)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jasmine Irvin, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Betty Williams, J.), rendered November 16, 2015, convicting her of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738) to be sufficient, as, inter alia, the defendant was sentenced to a conditional discharge and has completed serving that sentence. Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252).

RIVERA, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-irvin-nyappdiv-2019.