People v. Irizarry
Opinion
| People v Irizarry |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 01806 |
| Decided on March 16, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 16, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
2017-10087
(Ind. No. 2016-00161)
v
Nathan Irizarry, appellant.
Nathan Irizarry, Comstock, NY, appellant pro se.
Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 10, 2020 (People v Irizarry, 184 AD3d 667), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered September 5, 2017.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
LASALLE, P.J., BRATHWAITE NELSON, MALTESE and FORD, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
161 N.Y.S.3d 853 (People v. Irizarry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.