People v. Irizarry
641 N.E.2d 1073, 84 N.Y.2d 854, 617 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 2678
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant appeals by permission of a dissenting Associate Justice of the Appellate Division. Since the determination below involves an undisturbed mixed question of law and fact, which finds support in the record, we therefore affirm.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Irizarry, 641 N.E.2d 1073, 84 N.Y.2d 854, 617 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 2678 (N.Y. 1994).
641 N.E.2d 1073 (People v. Irizarry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Robinson
2018 NY Slip Op 2813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)