People v. Irby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Irby

95 A.D.2d 839, 464 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18778

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 A.D.2d 839 (People v. Irby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Irby, 95 A.D.2d 839, 464 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), imposed October 15, 1981, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, on a guilty plea, the sentence being an indeterminate term of a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 15 years’ imprisonment. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to an indeterminate term of a minimum of three years’ and a maximum of nine years’ imprisonment. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), imposed October 15, 1981, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, on a guilty plea, the sentence being an indeterminate term of a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 15 years’ imprisonment. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to an indeterminate term of a minimum of three years’ and a maximum of nine years’ imprisonment. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 839, 464 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-irby-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack