People v. Ippolito

155 A.D.2d 924, 549 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14778

This text of 155 A.D.2d 924 (People v. Ippolito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ippolito, 155 A.D.2d 924, 549 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sole issue on appeal is whether defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Here, our review of the evidence, the law and the circumstances of the case, viewed together and as of the time of representation, reveals that counsel was a reasonably competent attorney who provided defendant with meaningful representation (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Reed, J. — driving while intoxicated, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Satterfield
488 N.E.2d 834 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A.D.2d 924, 549 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ippolito-nyappdiv-1989.