People v. Inniss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Inniss

148 A.D.2d 637, 540 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3837

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 148 A.D.2d 637 (People v. Inniss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Inniss, 148 A.D.2d 637, 540 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), rendered February 27, 1987, convicting him of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and reckless endangerment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the verdict. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The remaining issues are unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), rendered February 27, 1987, convicting him of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and reckless endangerment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the verdict. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The remaining issues are unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 A.D.2d 637, 540 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-inniss-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack