People v. Inman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Inman

268 A.D.2d 898, 700 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 820

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 898 (People v. Inman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Inman, 268 A.D.2d 898, 700 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered February 11, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the first degree.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of robbery in the first degree and was sentenced as a [899]*899second felony offender to the agreed-upon prison term of eight years. Defense counsel contends that there are no nonfrivolous issues which can be raised on appeal and seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant. Upon review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered February 11, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the first degree.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of robbery in the first degree and was sentenced as a [899]*899second felony offender to the agreed-upon prison term of eight years. Defense counsel contends that there are no nonfrivolous issues which can be raised on appeal and seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant. Upon review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 898, 700 N.Y.S.2d 875, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-inman-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack