People v. Inkeles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Inkeles

34 A.D.2d 538, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5263

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 538 (People v. Inkeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Inkeles, 34 A.D.2d 538, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “Upon the appeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, •the following questions under the Constitution of the United States: whether the trial court adequately heard the issue as to the appellant’s competency to stand trial within the meaning of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution; and whether appellant’s equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution were violated by the trial court’s failure .to provide him with daily copies of the trial minutes.” Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, McNally, Tilzer and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “Upon the appeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, •the following questions under the Constitution of the United States: whether the trial court adequately heard the issue as to the appellant’s competency to stand trial within the meaning of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution; and whether appellant’s equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution were violated by the trial court’s failure .to provide him with daily copies of the trial minutes.” Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, McNally, Tilzer and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 538, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-inkeles-nyappdiv-1970.