People v. Ingram
287 A.D.2d 580, 731 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9599
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ingram. Read the opinion of the Court — 263 A.D.2d 959 →
Opinion
—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 3, 1994 (People v Ingram, 208 AD2d 561), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 14, 1989.
Ordered that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745). Friedmann, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ingram, 287 A.D.2d 580, 731 N.Y.S.2d 671, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
287 A.D.2d 580 (People v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Ingram
208 A.D.2d 561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)