People v. Ingram
26 N.E.3d 242, 24 N.Y.3d 1105, 2 N.Y.S.3d 414
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The determination whether police have reasonable suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ingram, 26 N.E.3d 242, 24 N.Y.3d 1105, 2 N.Y.S.3d 414 (N.Y. 2014).
26 N.E.3d 242 (People v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ingram
24 N.Y.3d 1201 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)