People v. Ingram

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Ingram

26 N.E.3d 242, 24 N.Y.3d 1105, 2 N.Y.S.3d 414

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 16, 2014

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 N.E.3d 242 (People v. Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ingram, 26 N.E.3d 242, 24 N.Y.3d 1105, 2 N.Y.S.3d 414 (N.Y. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The determination whether police have reasonable suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI