People v. Ingersoll

84 A.D.2d 716, 448 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15872

This text of 84 A.D.2d 716 (People v. Ingersoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ingersoll, 84 A.D.2d 716, 448 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rothwax, J., on suppression ruling, and Levittan, J., at trial and sentence), rendered January 7, 1981 convicting defendant, on jury verdict, of various counts of grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law, § 155.35), and falsifying business records in the first degree (Penal Law, § 175.10), and sentencing him thereon, is unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered. Concededly, the tape-recorded conversation between defendant and the witness Torrance should have been suppressed under People u Skinner (52 NY2d 24). On the facts of this case, we are unable to say that the error was harmless. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Silverman, Bloom and Fein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Skinner
417 N.E.2d 501 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 A.D.2d 716, 448 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ingersoll-nyappdiv-1981.