People v. Ineich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ineich

168 A.D.2d 946, 566 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16496

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D.2d 946 (People v. Ineich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ineich, 168 A.D.2d 946, 566 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of arson in the third degree (Penal Law § 150.10) for setting fire to a truck which was parked outside a bar he frequented in Syracuse. He contends on appeal that the court’s instructions to the jury on circumstantial evidence were erroneous. Defendant concedes that no objections were taken to the court’s charge and, thus, this issue has not been properly preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to exercise our discretion to reach this issue in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—arson, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of arson in the third degree (Penal Law § 150.10) for setting fire to a truck which was parked outside a bar he frequented in Syracuse. He contends on appeal that the court’s instructions to the jury on circumstantial evidence were erroneous. Defendant concedes that no objections were taken to the court’s charge and, thus, this issue has not been properly preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to exercise our discretion to reach this issue in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—arson, third degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D.2d 946, 566 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ineich-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack