People v. Illis
This text of 11 A.D.3d 481 (People v. Illis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Lott, J.), rendered February 26, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court properly declined to dismiss the depraved indifference murder count (see Penal Law § 125.25 [2]). Sufficient evidence was presented at trial to support the conclusion that the defendant acted recklessly and with depraved indifference to human life, rather than intentionally (see People v Sanchez, 98 NY2d 373 [2002]; People v Gallagher, 69 NY2d 525 [1987]; People v Register, 60 NY2d 270, 274 [1983], cert denied 466 US 953 [1984]; cf. People v Wall, 29 NY2d 863 [1971]).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s trial counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A.D.3d 481, 782 N.Y.S.2d 374, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-illis-nyappdiv-2004.