People v. Iliasov

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Iliasov

305 A.D.2d 283, 758 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5843

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 283 (People v. Iliasov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Iliasov, 305 A.D.2d 283, 758 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered October 31, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

After making an appropriate inquiry, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The plea allocution record contradicts defendant’s assertion of innocence and establishes that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily pleaded guilty. Defendant received a sufficient opportunity to consider the plea offer and never requested any additional time. We reject defendant’s claim that the plea was the product of threatening conduct by the court, since the comment at issue was not coercive when viewed in context. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered October 31, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

After making an appropriate inquiry, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The plea allocution record contradicts defendant’s assertion of innocence and establishes that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily pleaded guilty. Defendant received a sufficient opportunity to consider the plea offer and never requested any additional time. We reject defendant’s claim that the plea was the product of threatening conduct by the court, since the comment at issue was not coercive when viewed in context. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 283, 758 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-iliasov-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack