People v. Ilax

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ilax

261 A.D. 1084, 27 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8892

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 1084 (People v. Ilax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ilax, 261 A.D. 1084, 27 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

■ On appeal from a judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn [County of Kings], of tire crime of petit larceny, the judgment of conviction is modified by reducing the sentence from a term of imprisonment in the New York City Penitentiary to the period of imprisonment which the defendant has already served, and as so modified, unanimously affirmed. In our opinion the sentence imposed was grossly excessive for the theft of a piece of pastrami of the value of seventy-five cents, as a first offense. The probation report concerning this defendant, sent to this court at its request, amply justifies this conclusion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■ On appeal from a judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn [County of Kings], of tire crime of petit larceny, the judgment of conviction is modified by reducing the sentence from a term of imprisonment in the New York City Penitentiary to the period of imprisonment which the defendant has already served, and as so modified, unanimously affirmed. In our opinion the sentence imposed was grossly excessive for the theft of a piece of pastrami of the value of seventy-five cents, as a first offense. The probation report concerning this defendant, sent to this court at its request, amply justifies this conclusion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 1084, 27 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ilax-nyappdiv-1941.