People v. Iglesias

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Iglesias

190 A.D.2d 513, 593 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 513 (People v. Iglesias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Iglesias, 190 A.D.2d 513, 593 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Failla, J.), rendered November 29, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 5 to 10 years, to run concurrent with identical concurrent sentences imposed upon defendant upon his conviction, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, under a separate indictment, unanimously affirmed.

On June 28, 1990, the defendant and the co-defendant sold two glassines of heroin to an undercover officer. After a brief chase, the defendant was apprehended and one glassine of heroin and $20 in pre-recorded buy money were recovered from his person.

Defendant’s claim that statements made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of a fair trial is without merit. The prosecutor’s statements constituted a fair response to defense arguments. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Failla, J.), rendered November 29, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 5 to 10 years, to run concurrent with identical concurrent sentences imposed upon defendant upon his conviction, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, under a separate indictment, unanimously affirmed.

On June 28, 1990, the defendant and the co-defendant sold two glassines of heroin to an undercover officer. After a brief chase, the defendant was apprehended and one glassine of heroin and $20 in pre-recorded buy money were recovered from his person.

Defendant’s claim that statements made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of a fair trial is without merit. The prosecutor’s statements constituted a fair response to defense arguments. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 513, 593 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-iglesias-nyappdiv-1993.