People v. Idlet

115 A.D.2d 562, 496 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54975

This text of 115 A.D.2d 562 (People v. Idlet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Idlet, 115 A.D.2d 562, 496 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Groh, J.), rendered May 7, 1982, convicting him of four counts of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Since defense counsel did not object to the identification charge, the instant claim has not been preserved as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the trial court’s charge with respect to eyewitness identification was sufficient (see, People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273, 279). Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Whalen
451 N.E.2d 212 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A.D.2d 562, 496 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-idlet-nyappdiv-1985.