People v. Ibralic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ibralic

54 A.D.3d 1073, 864 N.Y.S.2d 187

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 54 A.D.3d 1073 (People v. Ibralic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ibralic, 54 A.D.3d 1073, 864 N.Y.S.2d 187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Contrary to defendant’s assertion, the record reveals that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Given his valid appeal waiver, defendant’s challenges to both the severity of his sentence and the denial of youthful offender treatment are precluded (see People v Stark, 49 AD3d 969 [2008]). Consequently, the judgment is affirmed.

Peters, J.E, Spain, Kane, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contrary to defendant’s assertion, the record reveals that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Given his valid appeal waiver, defendant’s challenges to both the severity of his sentence and the denial of youthful offender treatment are precluded (see People v Stark, 49 AD3d 969 [2008]). Consequently, the judgment is affirmed.

Peters, J.E, Spain, Kane, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.3d 1073, 864 N.Y.S.2d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ibralic-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack