People v. Hymes

168 A.D.2d 1003, 566 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16587

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: In 1987 defendant was held for the Grand Jury on a charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. On October 20, 1987 defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree on a superior court information.

In 1989 defendant was indicted for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]), i.e., possessing a firearm after having been previously convicted of a crime. The predicate crime was the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty in 1987.

Relying on our decision in People v Menchetti (154 AD2d 886), County Court dismissed the indictment because it was "not supported by a jurisdictionally valid crime.” Subsequently, the Court of Appeals reversed our decision (People v Menchetti, 76 NY2d 473). As a consequence, the superior court information on which defendant entered a plea was not jurisdictionally defective, as conceded by defendant, and the indictment herein is reinstated. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—dismiss ? indictment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hymes, 168 A.D.2d 1003, 566 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

168 A.D.2d 1003 (People v. Hymes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Menchetti
561 N.E.2d 536 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Menchetti
154 A.D.2d 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)