People v. Hylas
155 A.D.2d 965, 549 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14838
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon the exercise of our factual review power, and after weighing the relative probative force of the conflicting testimony, we áre satisfied that the jury’s verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — burglary, third degree, and another charge.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Law-ton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hylas, 155 A.D.2d 965, 549 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
155 A.D.2d 965 (People v. Hylas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ames
159 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)