People v. Hyde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hyde

207 A.D.2d 910, 616 N.Y.S.2d 992

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 910 (People v. Hyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hyde, 207 A.D.2d 910, 616 N.Y.S.2d 992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Joy, J.), rendered March 23, 1992, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have examined the record and find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). We reject the defendant’s contention that the court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty without holding a hearing (see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610). The defendant’s contention that the court should have recused itself at sentencing is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Joy, J.), rendered March 23, 1992, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have examined the record and find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). We reject the defendant’s contention that the court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty without holding a hearing (see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610). The defendant’s contention that the court should have recused itself at sentencing is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 910, 616 N.Y.S.2d 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hyde-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack