People v. Hutzenlaub

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hutzenlaub

290 A.D.2d 564, 737 N.Y.S.2d 300, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 784

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 28, 2002·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 25, 1999 (People v Hutzenlaub, 265 AD2d 574), affirming two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County, both rendered June 10, 1997.

[565] Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745). Ritter, Acting P.J., S. Miller, O’Brien and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 25, 1999 (People v Hutzenlaub, 265 AD2d 574), affirming two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County, both rendered June 10, 1997.

[565] Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745). Ritter, Acting P.J., S. Miller, O’Brien and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

People v. Hutzenlaub, 290 A.D.2d 564, 737 N.Y.S.2d 300, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

290 A.D.2d 564 (People v. Hutzenlaub) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related