People v. Hutchings

122 A.D.3d 447, 994 N.Y.S.2d 862
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hutchings. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 A.D.3d 1292
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2014·No. 13465 2681/07·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Caesar D. Cirigliano, J., at suppression hearing; Barbara F. Newman, J., at jury trial and sentencing), rendered March 10, 2010, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent *448 felony offender, to an aggregate term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress identification evidence. The court had the unique opportunity to see and hear the witnesses (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]), and there is no basis for disturbing its credibility determinations, in which it rejected defendant’s claim that he had requested the presence, at his lineup in this case, of one of the attorneys then representing him in pending cases.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s pro se claims.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Richter and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hutchings, 122 A.D.3d 447, 994 N.Y.S.2d 862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

122 A.D.3d 447 (People v. Hutchings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.