People v. Huston
This text of 772 N.W.2d 418 (People v. Huston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Cecil D. HUSTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion to add issues is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration *419 as on leave granted of the challenge to the scoring of Offense Variable 10, MCL 777.40, in light of People v. Cannon, 481 Mich. 152, 749 N.W.2d 257 (2008). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
772 N.W.2d 418, 485 Mich. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-huston-mich-2009.