People v. Hust
49 Cal. 653
This text of 49 Cal. 653 (People v. Hust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Hust, 49 Cal. 653 (Cal. 1875).
Opinion
The admission in evidence of a copy of the agreement set forth in the indictment, without accounting for the absence of the original, and without any proof whatever of the execution of the instrument, was clearly erroneous.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 Cal. 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hust-cal-1875.