People v. Hurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hurst

295 A.D.2d 807, 743 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 295 A.D.2d 807 (People v. Hurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hurst, 295 A.D.2d 807, 743 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered December 22, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate prison term of IV2 [808]*808to 3 years to run. consecutively to the term of imprisonment that he was then serving. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved, of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is therefore affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Her cure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered December 22, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate prison term of IV2 [808]*808to 3 years to run. consecutively to the term of imprisonment that he was then serving. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved, of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is therefore affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Her cure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 807, 743 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hurst-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack