People v. Hurley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hurley

269 A.D.2d 825, 703 N.Y.S.2d 780, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1743

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 825 (People v. Hurley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hurley, 269 A.D.2d 825, 703 N.Y.S.2d 780, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s CPL article 440 motion without conducting a hearing (see, CPL 440.30 [4] [c], [d]). Defendant concedes on appeal that three of the four grounds alleged are foreclosed from review by CPL 440.10 (2) (a) and (b). The remaining ground lacks merit because the supplemental record on appeal establishes that defendant was afforded funds to hire forensic witnesses. (Appeal from Order of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — CPL art 440.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s CPL article 440 motion without conducting a hearing (see, CPL 440.30 [4] [c], [d]). Defendant concedes on appeal that three of the four grounds alleged are foreclosed from review by CPL 440.10 (2) (a) and (b). The remaining ground lacks merit because the supplemental record on appeal establishes that defendant was afforded funds to hire forensic witnesses. (Appeal from Order of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — CPL art 440.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 825, 703 N.Y.S.2d 780, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hurley-nyappdiv-2000.