People v. Hurley

202 A.D.2d 371, 612 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3098

This text of 202 A.D.2d 371 (People v. Hurley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hurley, 202 A.D.2d 371, 612 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Haft, J.), rendered July 5, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of four counts of attempted assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and criminal trespass in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persisent violent felony offender, to five concurrent prison terms of 20 years to life on the assault and weapons possession counts, to be served concurrently with two concurrent terms of 3íó to 7 years on the controlled substance and trespass counts, unanimously affirmed. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter McQuillan, J.), entered June 3, 1992, denying defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10, unanimously affirmed.

In the absence of the documents defendant claims contains undisclosed Rosario material, some of which are in defendant’s possession as a result of his Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request and others of which might be obtained if defendant were to exhaust his administrative remedies under FOIL (Hurley v Brown, 184 AD2d 370), defendant failed to raise an issue of fact warranting a hearing on his claim that the People failed to disclose Rosario material (CPL 440.30 [4] [b]; see, People v Brown, 56 NY2d 242, 246-247; People v Friedgood, 58 NY2d 467, 473). Since defendant moved to consolidate his appeal from the denial of his CPL 440.10 motion with his direct appeal from the judgment, and since defendant raises only the Rosario claim on this consolidated appeal without offering any challenge to his conviction based on the trial record, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brown
436 N.E.2d 1295 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Friedgood
448 N.E.2d 1317 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Hurley v. Brown
184 A.D.2d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 371, 612 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hurley-nyappdiv-1994.