People v. Hundshamer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hundshamer

49 A.D.2d 1023, 374 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11378

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 1023 (People v. Hundshamer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hundshamer, 49 A.D.2d 1023, 374 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence adduced upon the trial provided ample support for the jury’s verdict of guilty of murder. No exceptions were taken to the charge of the court or requests to charge made. Upon the entire record including the charge of the court, we find no error so substantial as to have deprived defendant of a fair trial (CPL 470.15, subd 6, par [a]). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court convicting defendant of murder.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Mahoney, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence adduced upon the trial provided ample support for the jury’s verdict of guilty of murder. No exceptions were taken to the charge of the court or requests to charge made. Upon the entire record including the charge of the court, we find no error so substantial as to have deprived defendant of a fair trial (CPL 470.15, subd 6, par [a]). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court convicting defendant of murder.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Mahoney, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 1023, 374 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hundshamer-nyappdiv-1975.