People v. Humphrey

24 A.D.3d 469, 804 N.Y.S.2d 693
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Humphrey. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 A.D.3d 683

Opinion

by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), rendered May 11, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

As part of his plea agreement, the defendant effectively waived appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570 [1998]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 [1992]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]; People v Thorpe, 2 AD3d 467 [2003]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Humphrey, 24 A.D.3d 469, 804 N.Y.S.2d 693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

24 A.D.3d 469 (People v. Humphrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Muniz
696 N.E.2d 182 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Thorpe
2 A.D.3d 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)