People v. Hummer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hummer

217 A.D.2d 713, 629 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7663

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 217 A.D.2d 713 (People v. Hummer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hummer, 217 A.D.2d 713, 629 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an [714]*714order of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), entered December 6, 1994, which denied defendant’s motion to settle the transcript of the proceedings.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 15 years to life. County Court subsequently denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea. Defendant then moved to settle the transcripts of the proceedings based upon several amendments that he proposed. In opposition the People submitted, inter alia, the affidavit of the official court reporter who transcribed the minutes of the proceedings in question certifying that the transcripts were accurate. County Court settled the transcripts as certified by the court reporter. Given these circumstances, we find no abuse of County Court’s power to settle the transcripts and to decide any controversy relating to them in its denial of defendant’s motion.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an [714]*714order of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), entered December 6, 1994, which denied defendant’s motion to settle the transcript of the proceedings.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 15 years to life. County Court subsequently denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea. Defendant then moved to settle the transcripts of the proceedings based upon several amendments that he proposed. In opposition the People submitted, inter alia, the affidavit of the official court reporter who transcribed the minutes of the proceedings in question certifying that the transcripts were accurate. County Court settled the transcripts as certified by the court reporter. Given these circumstances, we find no abuse of County Court’s power to settle the transcripts and to decide any controversy relating to them in its denial of defendant’s motion.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 713, 629 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hummer-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack