People v. Hulse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hulse

198 A.D.2d 614, 604 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 198 A.D.2d 614 (People v. Hulse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hulse, 198 A.D.2d 614, 604 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered January 24, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of arson in the third degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Defendant received concurrent prison sentences of 2 to 6 years and 5 to 15 years on his conviction of two counts of arson in the third degree. He also received concurrent prison sentences of 2 to 6 years on his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and 5 to 15 years on his conviction of another count of arson in the third degree. The latter two sentences were to run consecutively to the first two sentences. Although defendant contends that the sentences were harsh and excessive, they were imposed in accordance with the plea agreement. Under the circumstances and given the serious nature of the crimes involved, as well as defendant’s criminal history, we find no reason to disturb the sentences imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered January 24, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of arson in the third degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Defendant received concurrent prison sentences of 2 to 6 years and 5 to 15 years on his conviction of two counts of arson in the third degree. He also received concurrent prison sentences of 2 to 6 years on his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and 5 to 15 years on his conviction of another count of arson in the third degree. The latter two sentences were to run consecutively to the first two sentences. Although defendant contends that the sentences were harsh and excessive, they were imposed in accordance with the plea agreement. Under the circumstances and given the serious nature of the crimes involved, as well as defendant’s criminal history, we find no reason to disturb the sentences imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 614, 604 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hulse-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack