People v. Hull

New York Supreme Court

People v. Hull

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638

DecidedJune 15, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638 (People v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hull, 71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment upon the submission is directed for the plaintiff that only one of the defendants is legally entitled to the office of, and to act as, supervisor for one ward in the city of Buffalo; that the defendant Frank H. Hull is entitled to the office of supervisor of the Fourth ward, and to the emoluments thereof, and that the defendant Thomas H. Munsell is entitled to the office of supervisor of the Third ward, and to the emoluments thereof. Opinion Per Curiam, left with

Lewis,. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment upon the submission is directed for the plaintiff that only one of the defendants is legally entitled to the office of, and to act as, supervisor for one ward in the city of Buffalo; that the defendant Frank H. Hull is entitled to the office of supervisor of the Fourth ward, and to the emoluments thereof, and that the defendant Thomas H. Munsell is entitled to the office of supervisor of the Third ward, and to the emoluments thereof. Opinion Per Curiam, left with

Lewis,. J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hull-nysupct-1892.