People v. Hulbert
This text of 747 N.W.2d 228 (People v. Hulbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Edward Franklin HULBERT, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
By order of November 29, 2007, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court, except that this Court agrees with the concurring judge in the Court of Appeals that there is no need for the resentencing to be before a different judge.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
747 N.W.2d 228, 480 Mich. 1184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hulbert-mich-2008.