Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hughes

People v. Hughes

269 A.D.2d 858, 703 N.Y.S.2d 767, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1816
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 858 (People v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hughes, 269 A.D.2d 858, 703 N.Y.S.2d 767, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The application of the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-c) to sex offenders convicted prior to the effective date of the act does not violate constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws (see, People v Langdon, 258 AD2d 937; see also, People v Hernandez, 264 AD2d 783; People v Grice, 254 AD2d 710, lv denied 92 NY2d 1032). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Sodomy, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Frank
37 A.D.3d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Brown
302 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 858, 703 N.Y.S.2d 767, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hughes-nyappdiv-2000.