People v. Hughes
269 A.D.2d 858, 703 N.Y.S.2d 767, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1816
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The application of the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-c) to sex offenders convicted prior to the effective date of the act does not violate constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws (see, People v Langdon, 258 AD2d 937; see also, People v Hernandez, 264 AD2d 783; People v Grice, 254 AD2d 710, lv denied 92 NY2d 1032). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Sodomy, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hughes, 269 A.D.2d 858, 703 N.Y.S.2d 767, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
269 A.D.2d 858 (People v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Frank
37 A.D.3d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Brown
302 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)