People v. Hughes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hughes

48 A.D.2d 643, 371 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9639

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 643 (People v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hughes, 48 A.D.2d 643, 371 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on October 30, 1972, convicting each defendant, after a joint trial, of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, possession of a weapon as a felony and, in the case of defendant, Lumford, reckless endangerment in the first degree and, in the cases of defendants, Beatty and Hughes, reckless endangerment in the second degree, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the convictions for grand larceny in the third degree and dismissing that count of the indictment and otherwise affirmed. (People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784) The People concede that the judgments should be so modified. We have examined the other contentions raised by the defendants and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Tilzer, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on October 30, 1972, convicting each defendant, after a joint trial, of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, possession of a weapon as a felony and, in the case of defendant, Lumford, reckless endangerment in the first degree and, in the cases of defendants, Beatty and Hughes, reckless endangerment in the second degree, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the convictions for grand larceny in the third degree and dismissing that count of the indictment and otherwise affirmed. (People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784) The People concede that the judgments should be so modified. We have examined the other contentions raised by the defendants and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Tilzer, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 643, 371 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hughes-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack