People v. Hughes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hughes

23 A.D.2d 761, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4520

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 761 (People v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hughes, 23 A.D.2d 761, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

On February 11, 1965 the Court of Appeals, by reason of the failure to assign counsel to defendant on the appeal in this court, reversed the order of this court affirming an order denying without a hearing defendant’s coram nobis application to vacate a judgment convicting him of murder in the second degree (see 15 H Y 2d 172, revg. 19 A D 2d 908), and remitted the action to this court for further proceedings. Pursuant [762]*762to such remission, the defendant’s appeal in this court is reinstated and reargument is granted. Anthony F. Marra, Esq., 100 Centre Street, New York, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal on behalf of the defendant. The time to perfect such appeal upon rcargument is enlarged. The appeal will be heard on the original paper’s now on file and on appellant’s typewritten brief. Appellant is directed to file six typewritten copies of his brief and serve one such copy on the District Attorney of Queens County. Beldóck, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On February 11, 1965 the Court of Appeals, by reason of the failure to assign counsel to defendant on the appeal in this court, reversed the order of this court affirming an order denying without a hearing defendant’s coram nobis application to vacate a judgment convicting him of murder in the second degree (see 15 H Y 2d 172, revg. 19 A D 2d 908), and remitted the action to this court for further proceedings. Pursuant [762]*762to such remission, the defendant’s appeal in this court is reinstated and reargument is granted. Anthony F. Marra, Esq., 100 Centre Street, New York, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal on behalf of the defendant. The time to perfect such appeal upon rcargument is enlarged. The appeal will be heard on the original paper’s now on file and on appellant’s typewritten brief. Appellant is directed to file six typewritten copies of his brief and serve one such copy on the District Attorney of Queens County. Beldóck, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 761, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hughes-nyappdiv-1965.