People v. Hughes

204 N.E.2d 849, 15 N.Y.2d 172, 256 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1577
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 1965·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An indigent defendant, who is by statute accorded an absolute right to appeal to the Appellate Division (or to some other appellate court), is entitled to the assignment of counsel to represent him on such appeal if he so requests. This rule applies whether the appeal be from a judgment of conviction or an order denying an application for coram nobis or habeas corpus relief. Since, then, the defendant before us was entitled to counsel in the Appellate Division, the order appealed from should be reversed and the appeal remitted to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. We pass on no other question.

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Feld, Burke and Bergan concur in Per Curiam opinion; Judges Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to affirm.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hughes, 204 N.E.2d 849, 15 N.Y.2d 172, 256 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1577 (N.Y. 1965).

204 N.E.2d 849 (People v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Grimes
32 N.Y.3d 302 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)
People v. Stultz
810 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Richardson
159 Misc. 2d 167 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Honore v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles
466 P.2d 485 (Washington Supreme Court, 1970)
United States ex rel. Griffin v. McMann
310 F. Supp. 72 (E.D. New York, 1970)
People v. Monahan
217 N.E.2d 664 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)